Search found 144 matches
- Mon Nov 14, 2011 4:14 pm
- Forum: Categorization / Standardization
- Topic: Концерт
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8579
Концерт
I'm about to submit some kontserty by Bortniansky, and I have a few questions: (i) I have seen that the Russian "kontsert" is categorized under "concertos". This sounds odd to me: I can agree that the kontsert has something in common with the (17th c. German Geistliches ) Konzert...
- Sun Nov 06, 2011 10:08 pm
- Forum: Score Requests
- Topic: Emilio de' Cavalieri: Rappresentatione di anima, et di corpo
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1886
Re: Emilio de' Cavalieri: Rappresentatione di anima, et di c
Yes, I know, and this edition looks quite faithful, but without any explanation of its principles and nevertheless, with obvious changes − I'm doubtful about the 3/2 and 6/4 time signatures; I suspect rhythms have been halved; I'm not sure if the B naturals represent B diesis or B quadro, and I'd li...
- Sat Nov 05, 2011 10:12 pm
- Forum: Score Requests
- Topic: Emilio de' Cavalieri: Rappresentatione di anima, et di corpo
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1886
Emilio de' Cavalieri: Rappresentatione di anima, et di corpo
Published by Muti, Rome 1600.
It seems that there had beens facsimiles published by Casa Editrice Claudio Monteverdi, 1912, and Forni, 1967.
Thanks!
It seems that there had beens facsimiles published by Casa Editrice Claudio Monteverdi, 1912, and Forni, 1967.
Thanks!
- Thu Nov 03, 2011 8:28 pm
- Forum: Other
- Topic: Bortniansky, Dmytro: Ich bete an die Macht der Liebe
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1857
Re: Bortniansky, Dmytro: Ich bete an die Macht der Liebe
the page title was "Tantum ergo", which was completely misleading :shock: This was my fault; and yes, it was! But it seems that Bortniansky wrote this piece indeed as a Tantum ergo − well, that's what Wikipedia says. He should have written it while in Italy (1769-1779), I suppose. My Hist...
- Sat Oct 29, 2011 12:20 pm
- Forum: Feature Requests / Bug Reports
- Topic: review place
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2278
review place
Is there somewhere a place, where a user could say "I think this work page needs to be re-tagged or re-copyrightreviewed, because of this or this" ? It's quite heavy to create a thread here each time; on the other hand a user's discussion page is practical, but which one? (Of course I have...
- Thu Oct 27, 2011 9:16 pm
- Forum: Score Requests
- Topic: Hajibeyov: Koroghlu
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1011
Re: Hajibeyov: Koroghlu
he is still under copyright in the EU If Hajibeyov was not a citizen of a country that is now member of the EU, and if this work was not published in a country that is now member of the EU, then within the EU the work's copyright status must follow the original country's (Azeri/Soviet?) copyright s...
- Thu Oct 20, 2011 7:29 pm
- Forum: Français (French)
- Topic: manque des parties dans le Poème de Chausson
- Replies: 4
- Views: 21949
Re: manque des parties dans le Poème de Chausson
Sur une page de discussion, il suffit de cliquer sur l'onglet "+" pour poster un message. Mais pour ce sujet, il vaut mieux poster ici : si ni Perlnerd666, ni Generoso (qui a aussi contribué à la page du Poème ) n'ont pu mettre les parties de cuivres et timbales, c'est qu'ils ne les ont pa...
- Mon Oct 10, 2011 7:19 am
- Forum: Categorization / Standardization
- Topic: John Bishop
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6605
Re: John Bishop
Thanks, I think it's well done now.
Sorry it took me some time to understand how it works!
Sorry it took me some time to understand how it works!
- Fri Oct 07, 2011 12:09 pm
- Forum: Categorization / Standardization
- Topic: John Bishop
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6605
Re: John Bishop
I created a person page for Bishop, John (d. 1890)
and tryed to use this:
but didn't get the exact result I hoped... So, the {{Link... templates do not have a field for a "display-only" form of the name?
and tryed to use this:
Code: Select all
|Editor={{LinkEd|John (d. 1890)|Bishop|"John Bishop"}}
- Wed Oct 05, 2011 8:23 pm
- Forum: Categorization / Standardization
- Topic: John Bishop
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6605
Re: John Bishop
This question has been discussed here a few days ago!
BTW, there are already on IMSPL 2 others works edited by John Bishop (19th c.), but without links!
BTW, there are already on IMSPL 2 others works edited by John Bishop (19th c.), but without links!
- Wed Oct 05, 2011 8:01 pm
- Forum: Categorization / Standardization
- Topic: John Bishop
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6605
Re: John Bishop
So there should be
"John Bishop" (for the oldest)
and
"John (1817-1890) Bishop" (for the editor).
Or, should it be dealt like for the 2 Heinrich Albert:
"Heinrich (d. 1651) Albert"
"Heinrich (d. 1950) Albert"
?
"John Bishop" (for the oldest)
and
"John (1817-1890) Bishop" (for the editor).
Or, should it be dealt like for the 2 Heinrich Albert:
"Heinrich (d. 1651) Albert"
"Heinrich (d. 1950) Albert"
?
- Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:32 pm
- Forum: Categorization / Standardization
- Topic: John Bishop
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6605
John Bishop
John Bishop (1665-1737) 's page says he edited The Art of Preluding, Op.300 by Carl Czerny... which work page says it was edited by John Bishop (1817–1890).
Any way to solve this?
Any way to solve this?
- Sun Oct 02, 2011 10:42 pm
- Forum: Categorization / Standardization
- Topic: Plate numbers
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2483
Plate numbers
I've just seen this, on a record by the NLA: Publication date approximated from publisher's imprint (Berlin, Breslau, Stettin) and pl. no. Cf. IMSLP/Petrucci Music Library. Pl. no.: B. & B. 1173. 8) Is there any way to *automatically* sort scores by plate numbers? There are tables on publisher ...
- Thu Sep 29, 2011 8:16 am
- Forum: Categorization / Standardization
- Topic: Madrigali a 5 voci (Pecci, Tommaso)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2260
Madrigali a 5 voci (Pecci, Tommaso)
While 'walking' for Renaissance bicinia, I found this book of "Madrigali a cinque voci ". The page says |Number of Movements/Sections=21 (8 madrigals with 2 parts - 5 with 1 part) |Tags=madrigals ; v ; 2vv ; 5vv ; it I don't think there is any one-voice or two-voice madrigals there, only &...
- Wed Sep 28, 2011 6:50 am
- Forum: Categorization / Standardization
- Topic: Arrangement vs. Alternate version
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3397
Arrangement vs. Alternate version
Let's say you have some 19th c. dance music piece, which cover states that it was originally published as both No.1: Piano solo version and No.2: Piano 4-hands version. I have seen in such case the 4-hands version moved under the header 'Arrangements and Transcriptions', 'For Piano 4 hands'. My humb...